[The following article is the fourth instalment in a series.]
4. The G20 Summit and After
The killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar took place in June 2023, and the alleged plot to murder Gurpatwant Singh Pannun took place a little earlier, in May-June 2023. The Canadian and US governments concluded immediately that these were done on the instruction of the Indian government. However, they did not publicly air their allegations of Indian government involvement in these two events till September in the case of Nijjar and November 2023 in the case of Pannun.
Keenly aware of the Indian rulers’ aspiration to recognition as a global power, the US did its best to make the September 2023 G20 summit in New Delhi a success. Biden attended the summit, in contrast to Putin and Xi, who stayed away. In the words of Brookings fellow Tanvi Madan, “Prime Minister Modi has wanted to make it India’s coming-out party to the world — as a major power, with its own independent voice, whose time has come”. The Wall Street Journal remarked:
… [F]rom an American standpoint, the most beneficial of… [recent] developments is the emergence of India as one of the world’s leading powers and as an increasingly close partner of the U.S. The G-20 summit was a personal diplomatic triumph for Prime Minister Narendra Modi. With both the Chinese and Russian leaders absent, Mr. Modi dominated center stage at a world gathering just weeks after India joined the elite club of countries that have landed probes on the moon.[1]
The G20 was set up to address the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and its aftermath, and hence was meant to focus on economic questions of global importance. At the present juncture, it was expected to focus on three grave questions: the debt crisis of developing countries, the rise in global food prices, and climate change. The questions of the reform of multilateral development banks and the multilateral trading system were also pressing. However, the Summit made negligible progress in relation to any economic issue, and restricted itself to some general statements of little practical consequence.[2] Instead the focus of discussion was shifted to achieving consensus on a resolution concerning the conflict in Ukraine. Once this was achieved by making a statement too vague to give offence to anyone, the summit was celebrated as a success.
(more…)